The appellants appealed two orders: a dismissal of an application for financial disclosure and a finding of contempt for breaching a prior court order by placing a clown with a crucifix on their lawn and yelling at neighbours.
The Divisional Court quashed the appeal of the dismissal order for lack of jurisdiction.
The court upheld the contempt finding against the husband but set aside the finding against the wife, as there was no evidence she actively placed the clown on the lawn.
