M. Nemanic

The applicant appealed the City of Toronto's failure to make a decision on a site plan application for 98 back-to-back townhouse units.

The parties reached a settlement.

Based on uncontested expert planning evidence, the Tribunal found the proposal represented good planning, facilitated efficient infill development, and provided a range of housing options.

The Tribunal approved the site plan subject to conditions.

The Ontario Land Tribunal held a first Case Management Conference regarding an appeal by the appellant against the respondent's Town-wide Development Charges By-law No. 2022.068.

The parties agreed on a timeline to move the appeal to a hearing on the merits.

The Tribunal directed the appellant to provide a draft Issues List and scheduled a second Case Management Conference to consider a final draft Procedural Order.

At a Case Management Conference regarding appeals of the City of Toronto's Community Benefits Charge By-law, the Tribunal directed the appellants to bring motions to determine two foundational jurisdictional issues: whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction to vary the prescribed 4% charge, and whether it has jurisdiction to alter exemptions in the by-law.

A third Case Management Conference and motion hearing was scheduled.

The appellants appealed the City of Mississauga's adoption of a Community Benefits Charge By-law under section 37(17) of the Planning Act.

At the first Case Management Conference, the Tribunal directed the parties to provide their particularized issues to the City to facilitate discussions and scoping of issues.

A second Case Management Conference was scheduled to finalize the procedural order, schedule a merits hearing, or address any preliminary motions.

The appellants appealed the Regional Municipality of Halton's new Development Charges By-law No. 25-22.

At the first Case Management Conference, the parties requested Tribunal-led mediation to reach a settlement or reduce the issues list.

A request for party status by the Southwest Georgetown Landowners Group Inc. was deferred to the next CMC, pending the outcome of the mediation.

The Tribunal directed the parties to file an agreed Procedural Order if a hearing on the merits remains necessary after mediation.

The Ontario Land Tribunal held a first Case Management Conference regarding appeals by multiple developers against the City of Toronto's Community Benefits Charge By-law.

The Tribunal granted participant status to one individual, scheduled a second Case Management Conference, and directed the parties to provide their particularized issues for the Procedural Order.

The Ontario Land Tribunal held a third Case Management Conference regarding appeals of the City of Mississauga's Official Plan Amendment No. 115.

The parties presented a revised draft Procedural Order and requested a phased hearing approach.

The Tribunal scheduled a 5-day Phase 1 hearing and a 25-day Phase 2 hearing, and directed the parties to submit a finalized Procedural Order with an Issues List.

The Tribunal held a Case Management Conference regarding appeals of the City of Mississauga's Official Plan Amendment No. 115.

The City brought a motion on consent for partial approval of the unappealed portions of the OPA.

The Tribunal granted the motion, bringing the unappealed portions into force.

The Tribunal deferred consideration of the draft Procedural Order and hearing phasing requests to a further Case Management Conference, as the parties did not have consensus on the conceptual approach to the first phase of the hearing.