Milad Haghani

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident.

The respondent denied benefits, arguing the applicant's injuries fell within the Minor Injury Guideline (MIG).

The applicant claimed his psychological injuries and hearing loss warranted removal from the MIG.

The Tribunal found the applicant failed to establish that his psychological condition or hearing loss removed him from the MIG, noting a lack of objective evidence and causation issues.

However, the Tribunal ordered the respondent to pay for two assessments because it failed to provide timely notices of denial under s. 38(8) of the Schedule.

The applicant's request for an award for unreasonable delay was dismissed.

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident.

The respondent denied several treatment plans, arguing the applicant's injuries fell within the Minor Injury Guideline (MIG).

The adjudicator found the applicant suffered from psychological conditions, including PTSD and Major Depressive Disorder, which removed her from the MIG.

The adjudicator approved a psychological services treatment plan and partially approved a physical therapy treatment plan, finding them reasonable and necessary.

Claims for a special award under s. 10 of Reg. 664 and costs were dismissed.

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident, including funding for chiropractic services, psychological services, and a catastrophic impairment assessment.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal denied the chiropractic services due to a lack of objective evidence and a significant gap in treatment.

The Tribunal granted the psychological services, noting consistent recommendations from both the applicant's and insurer's assessors.

The catastrophic impairment assessment was partially approved, with the Tribunal funding the psychological and occupational therapy components but denying the physiatry and neurological components as not reasonable or necessary.

The claim for a special award was dismissed.