The parties brought cross-motions for interim parenting and child support orders regarding their 26-month-old child.
The father sought equal parenting time and set-off child support, while the mother sought primary care and table child support, alleging a history of family violence.
The court found the mother was the primary caregiver and accepted her evidence of the father's aggressive and threatening behaviour.
The court ordered the child to remain in the mother's primary care with specified parenting time for the father.
The father was ordered to pay table child support and his proportionate share of daycare expenses, with income imputed to him following a recent job loss.
