The applicant employer sought judicial review of a grievance arbitration award that substituted a thirty-day suspension for the termination of an employee.
The Divisional Court stayed the application as premature, noting that the arbitrator had remitted the matter back to the parties and remained seized of the issue of whether reinstatement was an appropriate remedy.
The court held that judicial review should wait until the final disposition of the remedy to avoid overlapping work and inconsistent decisions.
