The applicant appealed the City's refusal of consent to sever a residential property into two lots and associated minor variances to reduce the required lot frontage.
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, finding that the proposed reduction in lot frontage from 15 metres to 10.97 metres would significantly disrupt the character of the designated Large Lot Neighbourhood.
The Tribunal preferred the City's planning evidence, concluding that the variances failed the four-part test under s. 45(1) of the Planning Act and the consent application did not conform to the Official Plan under s. 51(24).
