In an uncontested family law trial, the applicant sought child support, spousal support, equalization of net family property, and a vesting order for the matrimonial home.
The respondent, who had relocated to Pakistan and failed to provide financial disclosure or comply with court orders, had his Answer struck.
The court imputed the respondent's income at $120,000 and ordered retroactive and ongoing child and spousal support, along with an equalization payment.
Due to the respondent's non-compliance and abandonment, the court vested his interest in the matrimonial home in the applicant to satisfy the amounts owed, and awarded full recovery costs against him for bad faith.
