Marc Bhalla

The applicant, a condominium unit owner, requested email correspondence referenced in board meeting minutes regarding a gas contract renewal.

The respondent condominium corporation failed to reply within the mandated 30-day period but argued the emails did not exist or were not official records.

The Tribunal found that the emails, even if they existed, did not constitute records under the Condominium Act, 1998.

However, because the respondent failed to reply to the records request within the statutory timeframe, the Tribunal awarded the applicant $200 in costs for the tribunal filing fees.

The applicant, a condominium unit owner, and the respondent condominium corporation agreed to settle a dispute regarding a records request.

The Condominium Authority Tribunal issued a consent order requiring the corporation to provide the applicant with a list of unit owners, documentation and video footage regarding a pool incident, an internal policy on late charges, and confirmation of directors' mandatory training.

The case was resolved without a hearing, with each party bearing their own costs.

The applicant and respondent agreed to settle the case using the Condominium Authority Tribunal's online system.

The parties consented to merge this case with another related case involving the same issues.

The tribunal issued a consent order closing the current case and adding the respondent to the related case.

The applicant, a condominium unit owner, requested financial records and records pertaining to a shared facilities agreement from the respondent condominium corporation.

During the online written hearing process, the respondent provided the requested records to the applicant's satisfaction.

The parties confirmed the issues were resolved, and the Tribunal ordered the case closed with each party bearing their own costs.