The plaintiff brought an action for damages arising from a rear-end motor vehicle collision where he struck the defendants' vehicle from behind.
The defendants and the plaintiff's insurer brought a motion for summary judgment to dismiss the action.
The court found that the physical evidence and the consistent testimony of the defendants established that the defendants were stopped at a red light when struck.
The plaintiff's evidence was inconsistent and evolved over time.
Applying the test for summary judgment, the court concluded there was no genuine issue requiring a trial, found the plaintiff entirely at fault, and dismissed the action.
