The appellant appealed four summary judgments granted against him for various debts (mortgages, lines of credit, credit card).
The appellant's arguments, consistent with "pseudolegal" theories, asserted that he was not subject to Canadian law by attempting to separate himself from his legal personhood.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, affirming the motion judge's finding that no legally tenable defence was advanced.
The court reiterated that such arguments consistently fail and consume court resources.
The court also confirmed the admissibility of the bank's business records under the Evidence Act.
