The appellant appealed his convictions and sentence for firearms offences, arguing the trial judge misapprehended evidence and made unreasonable findings of guilt.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the conviction appeal, finding no critical misapprehensions of evidence and that the findings were firmly rooted in circumstantial evidence.
The sentence appeal was also dismissed, as the appellant was apprehended with a fully loaded semi-automatic handgun while bound by a recognizance and a firearms prohibition, making the sentence fit.
