In a long-running family law trial involving parenting and financial issues, the self-represented respondent brought an oral mid-trial motion to amend his Answer to add retroactive and ongoing spousal support claims.
Applying Rule 11(3) of the Family Law Rules and the amendment framework in Moghimi, the court held that permitting the amendment at this late stage would require a lengthy adjournment, further disclosure, and likely additional evidence, causing prejudice to the other party and the child that costs could not remedy.
The court emphasized the pressing need for finality in a high-conflict parenting case, the impact of delay on the child’s best interests, and the administration of justice.
The motion was dismissed.
