The appellant developer appealed a decision dismissing its application to declare a municipality's conveyance of access lands to a respondent developer void.
The municipality had transferred a one-foot reserve and four lots dedicated as a public highway to the respondent to provide road access to landlocked development lands.
The Court of Appeal found that the conveyance constituted a 'sale' of 'surplus' land under s. 193 of the Municipal Act.
The municipality failed to comply with the mandatory procedural requirements of s. 193, including passing a procedure by-law and providing public notice.
Furthermore, the by-law passed under s. 297 to stop up the highway lots did not exempt the municipality from public notice requirements.
The appeal was allowed and the conveyance was declared void.