The appellant appealed the County's failure to make a decision on applications for an official plan amendment, zoning by-law amendment, and plan of subdivision to permit a 306-unit residential subdivision.
At a case management conference, the Tribunal granted party status to four neighbouring developers and participant status to several individuals.
The Tribunal declined to set hearing dates due to the need for the parties to collaborate on an issues list and the County's intention to bring a motion regarding the appropriateness of setting dates while an interim control by-law is in effect.
A second case management conference was scheduled.
