P. Le Vay is an Ontario lawyer with 3 court cases on record from 2021 to 2023.

What courts has P. Le Vay appeared in?

P. Le Vay has appeared in Superior Court of Justice.

How many cases has P. Le Vay handled?

P. Le Vay has 3 cases on record from 2021 to 2023.

What judges has P. Le Vay appeared before?

P. Le Vay has most frequently appeared before Justice Chalmers, Justice Todd Robinson, Justice Mills.

P. Le Vay | Lawyer

3 total

Bensen v. McCarthy Tétrault LLP, 2023 ONSC 7527

The defendants, a law firm and one of its partners, brought a motion to strike the plaintiffs' statement of claim for disclosing no reasonable cause of action.

The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants breached an ad hoc fiduciary duty and aided and abetted a breach of an undertaking and a breach of the Business Corporations Act while representing a corporation in an employment matter.

The court granted the motion to strike without leave to amend, finding no facts to support a fiduciary relationship and holding that the claims for aiding and abetting were contrary to public policy as they would interfere with the lawyer-client relationship.

SCJJun 30, 2023

Applicant Counsel

Khan v. Law Society of Ontario, 2021 ONSC 6019

The plaintiff, a disbarred lawyer, brought an action against the Law Society of Ontario and several of its employees, alleging various torts and Charter breaches related to his disciplinary proceedings.

The LSO defendants brought a motion to strike the Statement of Claim.

The court granted the motion, finding that the LSO defendants were protected by statutory immunity under the Law Society Act and that the plaintiff failed to plead material facts to support his claims of bad faith, misfeasance in public office, Charter breaches, intrusion upon seclusion, and defamation.

The court also found the action to be an abuse of process as a collateral attack on the disciplinary tribunal's decisions.

The Statement of Claim was struck without leave to amend.

SCJSep 9, 2021

Applicant Counsel

Sakab Saudi Holding Company v. Al Jabri, 2021 ONSC 3909

The plaintiffs obtained a Mareva injunction against the defendant, Dr. Al Jabri, requiring him to disclose his worldwide assets and submit to cross-examination.

During the cross-examination, disputes arose regarding the scope of permissible questions, particularly concerning assets held prior to the Mareva order, assets gifted to his son, and assets transferred to others.

The plaintiffs brought a motion for directions.

The court held that the plaintiffs are entitled to examine the defendant on former assets, gifted assets, and transferred assets to test whether he retains any continuing interest in or control over them, as such assets would be captured by the Mareva order.

The court provided a framework for the permissible scope of cross-examination and ordered the defendant to re-attend.

SCJMay 28, 2021