5 total
Action stayed pending payment of previously ordered costs, failing which it will be dismissed.
The defendant moved to dismiss the plaintiff's personal injury action for failure to comply with two previous court orders requiring the plaintiff to answer undertakings and refusals, and to pay costs.
The court found that while the plaintiff had made substantial progress on the undertakings and refusals, she had failed to pay the previously ordered costs of $10,203 without a valid explanation.
The court ordered the action stayed pending payment of the costs within 60 days, failing which the action would be dismissed.
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed with costs awarded to the responding parties.
The moving party brought a motion for leave to appeal an earlier order.
The Divisional Court dismissed the motion for leave to appeal and awarded all-inclusive costs of $3,500 to the municipal respondent and $5,000 to the regional and corporate respondents, payable within 30 days.
Motion for leave to appeal granted with costs fixed at $5,000.
The defendants brought a motion for leave to appeal the order of Doi J. dated January 23, 2020.
The Divisional Court granted the motion for leave to appeal, with costs of the motion fixed at $5,000 payable in the discretion of the appeal panel.
Successful plaintiff on appeal awarded $4,000 in costs on a partial indemnity scale.
Following the plaintiff's success in resisting an appeal from a Master's order, the parties made written submissions on costs.
The plaintiff sought costs on a substantial indemnity scale or, alternatively, on a partial indemnity scale.
The court found no reason to award costs on an elevated scale and fixed the plaintiff's costs on a partial indemnity basis at $4,000 inclusive of disbursements and taxes.
Insurer's motion to adjourn arbitration for independent medical examinations denied due to unreasonable delay.
The insurer brought a preliminary motion to adjourn the arbitration hearing pending the applicant's attendance at independent medical examinations by a psychiatrist and a physiatrist, and for document production.
The arbitrator dismissed the request for an adjournment, finding that the insurer's request for examinations 15 months after receiving new medical information and after filing its response to the arbitration application was unreasonable and intended solely to bolster its case at the hearing.
The arbitrator ordered the exchange of specific documents, including OHIP summaries, clinical notes, and the insurer's accident benefits file.