The applicant mother brought an urgent motion seeking permission to take the parties' 15-year-old daughter on a vacation to the Dominican Republic and to dispense with the respondent father's consent.
The father's position was inconsistent; he initially refused, then claimed he had signed consent, and later withdrew consent when costs were sought.
The court granted the mother's request for the trip, finding it to be in the child's best interests and deeming the father's attempt to barter consent inappropriate.
The issue of costs was adjourned, with a conditional order that if the father fails to provide evidence by a specified date that he had previously signed the consent, costs of $2,000 plus HST would be fixed against him.
The court also clarified that affidavits detailing abusive third-party communications, not attributable to a party, are irrelevant for costs determination.