The appellants appealed a trial judgment finding that they were required to reimburse the respondents for both the principal and interest on borrowed monies.
The Court of Appeal upheld the trial judge's decision, finding no reversible error in the credibility assessment that formed the basis of the finding regarding the parties' true intentions.
Although the trial judge erred regarding the admissibility of a letter and the application of the contra proferentem doctrine, these errors were not material to the outcome.
The appeal was dismissed with costs.
