6 total
Revised jackpot-sharing agreement did not cover winnings earned while only one brother attended.
The plaintiff sought half of a casino royal flush jackpot won by his brother, alleging breach of an oral jackpot-sharing agreement, breach of trust, and unjust enrichment.
The court found there had been a longstanding arrangement to share significant gambling winnings when the brothers attended and played together, but that arrangement was narrowed by an April 17, 2022 text exchange to apply only when both were there together.
Because the defendant won the jackpot while alone, the revised agreement did not apply and there was no breach.
The court also rejected the trust and unjust enrichment claims and dismissed the action.
Liquor licence conditions modified to extend hours based on change in ownership and compliance history.
The applicant, owner of the Scruffy Duck Restaurant, appealed a Notice of Proposal by the Registrar of Alcohol and Gaming refusing to remove conditions from its liquor licence.
The conditions restricted indoor and patio hours and prohibited live or amplified music on the patio.
The applicant argued a change in circumstances since purchasing the establishment in 2008 and that removing conditions was not contrary to the public interest.
Objectors raised concerns about noise and patron behaviour.
The Tribunal found a change in circumstances, noting the new owners had no compliance issues and had implemented sound control measures.
The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, extending indoor and patio hours, but retained the prohibitions on live and amplified music on the patio due to proximity to residential neighbours.
Consent resolution accepted imposing 12-year suspension and $25,000 fine for positive horse drug test.
The appellant, a licensed driver/trainer/owner, requested a hearing after a horse he trained tested positive for Darbepoetin-Alpha (Aranesp) during out-of-competition testing.
The Executive Director of the Ontario Racing Commission had proposed a 12-year suspension and a $40,000 fine.
At the hearing, the parties presented a joint resolution agreement.
The Commission accepted the agreement, imposing a 12-year suspension and a reduced fine of $25,000, noting the appellant's lower level of industry involvement compared to previous cases.
Licensee's request for an adjournment of the suspension appeal hearing granted on consent.
The licensee, a standardbred driver, appealed a Notice of Proposed Order and an Order of Immediate Suspension issued by the Executive Director.
At the hearing, the licensee requested an adjournment, which was granted on consent.
The hearing was rescheduled for November 2009.
Interim suspension of liquor licence rescinded on consent subject to strict security and surveillance conditions.
The Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario and the licensee agreed to rescind the interim suspension of the licensee's liquor licence following a fatal shooting outside the premises.
The Board ordered the suspension rescinded subject to strict conditions, including mandatory video surveillance, third-party security personnel, patron searches, and a 4:00 a.m. clearing time.
Adjournment of racing penalty appeal granted to allow appellant to attend; disclosure deemed complete.
The appellant, a standardbred licensee, appealed penalties imposed for his driving actions.
At the hearing, his counsel sought an adjournment due to alleged incomplete disclosure and the appellant being out of the country.
The Ontario Racing Commission granted the adjournment to allow the appellant to attend, but ruled that the Administration had satisfied its disclosure obligations.
The Commission directed that the hearing be rescheduled for January and ordered that the stay of penalty would terminate if the matter did not proceed on that date.
