The appellant appealed a jury's damage assessment and several evidentiary and procedural rulings by the trial judge, including the handling of an improper question during cross-examination, the exclusion of employment records, and the denial of a request for an assignment of long-term disability benefits.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding the jury's verdict was not perverse, the trial judge's curative instruction was sufficient, and the employment records were properly excluded.
The court dismissed the ground regarding the assignment of benefits without prejudice to the appellant bringing a further motion on proper material.
