2 total
Reconsideration request dismissed; appellant failed to prove appeal was filed within statutory deadline.
The appellant requested a reconsideration of a Board order that dismissed his appeal of a Statement of Account for being filed past the 10-business day statutory deadline.
The appellant argued the Board erred in fact and reasoning by not accepting that his appeal was emailed on time but delayed by server errors.
The Board dismissed the reconsideration request, finding no error of law or fact, noting that the appellant failed to prove the email was received by the deadline and that statutory timelines cannot be waived.
The Board also rejected new evidence and a new ground of appeal regarding deemed service under the PAWS Act.
Vehicle impoundment appeal dismissed as owner failed to prove vehicle was stolen, due diligence, or exceptional hardship.
The appellant appealed the 45-day impoundment of her motor vehicle under section 50.2 of the Highway Traffic Act after it was driven by an individual with a suspended licence.
The appellant argued the vehicle was stolen, that due diligence was exercised, and that the impoundment caused exceptional hardship.
The Licence Appeal Tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding that the driver had implied consent to use the vehicle, no reasonable steps were taken to verify the driver's licence status, and alternatives to the impounded vehicle were available, precluding a finding of exceptional hardship.
