Following the sale and dissolution of a mass spectrometry joint venture, the plaintiff sued for approximately half of alleged profits arising from deferred service contracts transferred to a third party.
The defendants argued the claim was barred by the prior arbitration concerning a separate inventory issue, or alternatively had to proceed to arbitration under a dispute resolution agreement governed by foreign law.
The court held that neither issue estoppel nor cause of action estoppel applied because the deferred service contract issue was expressly kept out of the earlier arbitration.
Applying the competence-competence principle, and in light of conflicting expert evidence on U.S. and New York law, the court found it was at least arguable that the dispute fell within the arbitration clause and stayed the action pending arbitration.