The accused, Akram Elmuradi, was charged with sexual assault.
The defence conceded sexual activity but argued consent, explicitly not relying on mistaken belief in consent.
The case hinged on the credibility of the complainant and the accused.
The court found the accused engaged in deceitful conduct to create an opportunity for sexual activity, exploiting the complainant's trust and vulnerability as a client seeking therapeutic massage.
The complainant's testimony regarding lack of consent was accepted, and the accused's account was deemed implausible and incredible.
The court found the Crown proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the complainant did not consent and that the accused knew the sexual contact was unwanted.
The accused was found guilty of sexual assault.