The appellant appealed a Landlord and Tenant Board decision terminating his tenancy for non-payment of rent, which included parking charges.
He argued that the Board member was biased, denied him procedural fairness, and erred in finding that parking charges could be included in rent geared to income.
The Divisional Court dismissed the appeal, finding no denial of procedural fairness and holding that the Board correctly applied a binding 2017 Divisional Court decision between the same parties.
The court also upheld the Board's finding that the parking agreement was not signed under duress.
