The appellant appealed his convictions for trafficking in cocaine and possession of the proceeds of crime.
The Crown alleged the appellant was the supplier to a co-conspirator who dealt directly with an undercover officer.
The trial judge found the appellant and the co-conspirator were engaged in a conspiracy to traffic cocaine.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding no misapprehension of evidence by the trial judge and concluding that the conviction for possession of proceeds of crime flowed directly from the trafficking conviction.
