The plaintiffs brought a motion for partial summary judgment seeking declarations that a municipal fill by-law did not apply to their property containing an abandoned gravel pit and aerodrome.
The court held that the summary judgment process was appropriate and that it could grant judgment adverse to the moving party where the evidentiary record permitted determination of the legal issues.
Interpreting the Municipal Act, 2001 and the Aggregate Resources Act, the court found that the abandoned pit did not fall within statutory exemptions applicable to licensed or operating pits and that the municipal by-law regulating the dumping of fill therefore applied.
The court also rejected arguments that the by-law was constitutionally inapplicable to the aerodrome under interjurisdictional immunity, relying on appellate authority confirming that municipal fill by-laws aimed at environmental protection do not trench on the core of federal aeronautics power.
Partial summary judgment was effectively granted in favour of the municipality on the legal issues raised by the motion.