2 total
Summary judgment was granted to a commercial landlord for rent arrears after the tenant defaulted and the landlord reasonably mitigated damages.
The plaintiff, 2506045 Ontario Inc., brought a motion for summary judgment against the defendants, Jeffrey Thomas Gaskell and Atilla Rahmaty, for breach of a commercial lease and indemnity agreement.
The tenant, Rahmaty, and indemnifier, Gaskell, defaulted on rent payments for a Mediterranean restaurant premises.
The plaintiff terminated the lease and secured a new tenant within three months.
The defendants disputed the quantum of damages, asserting the plaintiff failed to mitigate losses and that the lease was unconscionable or vague.
The court found that the plaintiff took reasonable steps to mitigate damages and that the defendants failed to provide sufficient evidence to the contrary.
The court also rejected the arguments of unconscionability and vagueness, noting the defendants' active negotiation of lease terms.
Summary judgment was granted in favour of the plaintiff for $223,749 plus prejudgment interest.
Leave to appeal denied; OMB properly applied effective representation principles in approving 47-ward structure.
The moving parties sought leave to appeal an Ontario Municipal Board decision approving a 47-ward structure for the City of Toronto's municipal elections.
They argued the Board erred in law by failing to prioritize voter parity and by not requiring a corresponding by-law changing the composition of City Council.
The Divisional Court dismissed the motion, finding no reason to doubt the correctness of the Board's application of the Carter principles for effective representation.
The court held that the moving parties were improperly challenging findings of fact and that the Board lacked jurisdiction to determine council composition.
