3 total
Issue estoppel applied to property assessment appeal; minor retail increase did not change industrial classification.
MPAC brought a motion arguing that the doctrine of issue estoppel applied to the appellant's property assessment appeals for the 2009-2012 taxation years, as the property's classification had been previously litigated.
The appellant opposed, arguing a change in material facts due to a 10% increase in retail sales at the bakery operation.
The Assessment Review Board dismissed the appellant's procedural objection regarding notice and granted MPAC's motion.
The Board found that the three requirements for issue estoppel were met and that the minor change in retail business did not alter the property's industrial classification.
Mistrial granted in murder trial due to Crown's inflammatory and improper opening address.
The accused, charged with second-degree murder, brought a motion for a mistrial following the Crown's opening address.
The defence argued the Crown's remarks were inflammatory, included personal opinions, and improperly commented on the anticipated defence strategy, thereby undermining the accused's right to silence and reversing the burden of proof.
The court agreed, finding the Crown's characterization of the accused as an 'animal' and its pre-emptive arguments irreparably damaged the fairness of the trial.
The motion was granted and a mistrial was ordered.
Tow truck operator acquitted of criminal negligence causing death after fatal highway collision.
The accused, a tow truck operator, was charged with criminal negligence causing death after parking his flatbed tow truck partially in the fast lane of Highway 403 to assist a stranded motorist.
A driver travelling in the fast lane struck the rear of the tow truck and was killed instantly.
The court assessed whether the accused's actions constituted a marked and substantial departure from the standard of care of a reasonable tow truck operator.
After considering expert testimony on towing industry standards and human factors, the court found that the accused's actions, while risky, fell within accepted industry practices and did not amount to a wanton or reckless disregard for the lives and safety of others.
The accused was found not guilty.