8 total
The court granted multiple orders in a CCAA proceeding, including property sale approval and the appointment of a mediator for cost allocation disputes.
This endorsement grants several orders sought by the Applicants in ongoing Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) proceedings, including approval of the Monitor’s reports and activities, amendment of reporting obligations, addition of Block 6 Holding Inc. as an Applicant, approval of a property sale and related distributions, and the appointment of a mediator to address cost allocation issues among financiers.
The court finds all relief appropriate and supported by the record.
The court approved a reverse vesting order and related relief in a CCAA insolvency proceeding.
The decision concerns the approval of a reverse vesting order (RVO) in the context of insolvency proceedings under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA).
The Court-appointed Monitor sought approval for a transaction involving the sale of all shares of the Purchased Companies to North Mill Equipment Finance LLC, the granting of related releases, a sealing order, and an extension of the stay of proceedings.
The court reviewed the necessity and fairness of the RVO structure, the process leading to the transaction, and the impact on stakeholders, ultimately granting the relief sought.
The court granted interim CCAA relief, authorizing deferred payments for working capital and interim distributions.
This decision concerns motions brought by Pride Group Holdings Inc. and related applicants under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) for interim relief in their restructuring proceedings.
The court addresses requests for approval of interim distributions, payment of direct costs, application of deferred payments for working capital, and approval of certain activities of the Monitor.
The court grants the requested relief, finding it necessary to maintain liquidity and continue the wind-down process, and holds that the proposed mechanisms are equitable and consistent with the CCAA’s remedial objectives.
The court approved a related-party asset purchase agreement and granted a stay extension under the CCAA.
The Monitor, FTI Consulting Canada Inc., brought a motion for an approval and vesting order in respect of the Purchased Assets and the sale thereof to Vault or an affiliate pursuant to the Rifco Asset Purchase Agreement, and for a stay extension order.
The Court approved the Rifco APA and the AVO, finding the process reasonable, the requirements of the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act satisfied, and the transaction in the best interests of stakeholders.
The stay extension was also granted.
Motion to lift CCAA stay to appoint a receiver over real estate properties dismissed.
In the context of CCAA proceedings, National Bank of Canada moved to lift the stay of proceedings to appoint a receiver over four real estate properties for which it was the first-ranking mortgage lender.
The applicants and the Monitor opposed the appointment, arguing that the existing sales process under the Real Estate Protocol was functioning well and that appointing a new court officer would add unnecessary costs without significant benefit.
The court dismissed the motion to appoint a receiver, finding it was not just or convenient, but granted a Rent Enforcement Order allowing net rents to be paid to the moving party.
The court also granted a sealing order for the property appraisals to protect the integrity of the ongoing sales process.
The court approved property proceeds distribution and vehicle retrieval but adjourned a factoring sale motion.
In a CCAA proceeding, the Applicants sought three orders: approval of a factoring portfolio purchase agreement, approval for distribution of proceeds from a property sale, and permission for a creditor to sell certain vehicles.
The court approved the distribution of Chehalis property proceeds to Roynat.
For the Regions vehicles, the court granted the order allowing Regions to take possession, setting a 30-day retrieval period and approving storage costs of $35/day.
The motion for approval of the JD Factors Purchase Agreement was adjourned to a later date, as Mitsubishi HC Capital Canada Inc. objected, claiming ownership of the receivables and requiring more time to prepare its position.
The court approved a property sale, solicitation process, and governance protocol in a CCAA restructuring.
In a Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) proceeding, the applicants sought court approval for the sale of a real property, the Monitor's reports, a revised governance protocol, and a sale and investor solicitation process (SISP) for their logistics business.
The court approved the property sale, finding it met the Soundair Principles despite not being a court-supervised process.
The Monitor's reports and activities were also approved.
The proposed SISP was approved with a minor amendment requiring the Monitor to consult directly affected secured creditors.
The Revised Governance Protocol, which included default commission rates for vehicle sales and collections, was approved as an interim measure, balancing the need for cost recovery with creditor concerns, noting that financiers could negotiate alternative rates or withhold consent to sales.
Provincial oil and gas abandonment obligations survive bankruptcy and bind the trustee-managed estate.
The appellants, a provincial energy regulator and an orphan well association, appealed from a decision holding that provincial oil and gas licensing obligations could not be enforced against a trustee in bankruptcy because they conflicted with the federal Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act.
The majority of the Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that the regulator's use of its statutory powers to enforce end-of-life abandonment and reclamation obligations did not create an operational conflict or frustration of purpose with the BIA.
The majority found that s. 14.06(4) of the BIA shields trustees only from personal liability, not the liability of the bankrupt estate, and that a bona fide public regulator enforcing public duties is not a creditor asserting a claim provable in bankruptcy.
Moldaver and Côté JJ. dissented, finding a genuine operational conflict and frustration of purpose under both branches of the paramountcy test, and that the Abitibi three-part test for provable claims was satisfied.