The applicant sought judicial review of a reconsideration decision by the respondent police service, which refused to remove non-conviction information from his Vulnerable Sector Check.
The information related to withdrawn and stayed charges involving allegations of criminal harassment, sexual assault, and sexual interference where the alleged victims included children.
The Divisional Court dismissed the application, finding that the police service's interpretation of 'alleged victim' and 'pattern of predation' under the Police Records Checks Reform Act was reasonable and consistent with the legislation's purpose of protecting children and vulnerable persons.
