The applicant, a medical resident, sought judicial review of a decision by the university's Senate Appeals Committee that upheld her placement on academic probation due to poor performance and patient safety concerns.
The applicant argued that the committee violated procedural fairness and that its decision was unreasonable.
The Divisional Court dismissed the application, finding that the committee provided a high degree of procedural fairness, cured any minor procedural defects through a de novo hearing, and reached a reasonable decision within its academic expertise.
