25 total
Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to enforce condominium pet rules on city-owned boulevard maintained by the corporation.
The applicant, a unit owner, applied to the Condominium Authority Tribunal seeking enforcement of the condominium corporation's pet rules regarding a boulevard maintained by the corporation.
The respondent corporation argued the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction because the boulevard was owned by the City of Toronto, not the corporation.
The Tribunal agreed, finding that the boulevard did not form part of the condominium property or assets, and therefore the corporation's rules could not apply to it under section 58 of the Condominium Act, 1998.
The application was dismissed with no costs awarded.
Condominium corporation ordered to reimburse filing fee after breaching settlement agreement regarding posting of board minutes.
The applicant unit owner alleged that the respondent condominium corporation breached a settlement agreement by failing to post board meeting minutes to its website within seven days of approval.
The Tribunal found that the respondent breached the agreement with respect to one set of minutes, which were posted two months late.
However, the Tribunal held it lacked statutory authority to impose fines on the corporation or its board members for the breach.
As the minutes had since been posted, the Tribunal ordered the respondent to reimburse the applicant's $125 filing fee.
Condominium unit owner denied unredacted proxy forms and damages; corporation's redaction fee deemed reasonable.
The applicant, a condominium unit owner, requested unredacted copies of proxy forms and an excel summary sheet from the corporation's annual general meeting.
The condominium corporation refused to provide unredacted proxies, citing statutory privacy requirements, and stated the excel sheet was not part of the proxy records requested.
The Condominium Authority Tribunal held that the applicant was not entitled to unredacted proxies as they contained personal information protected under the Condominium Act.
The Tribunal also found the excel sheet was not a proxy instrument and required a separate request.
The corporation's estimated fee of $232.20 for redacting and copying the records was deemed reasonable.
Claims for damages and costs were dismissed.
Condominium corporation ordered to explain redactions and pay $350 penalty for delayed records production.
The applicant, a condominium unit owner, filed multiple requests for records from the respondent condominium corporation shortly after its turnover meeting.
While many records were provided or resolved during mediation, several remained in dispute at the adjudication stage.
The Tribunal found that the respondent had adequately responded to most requests but failed to provide a written statement explaining redactions to unaudited financial records as required by the regulations.
The Tribunal ordered the respondent to provide the missing explanations, attempt to locate pre-turnover board minutes, and pay a $350 penalty for delays, along with $200 in costs.
Condominium corporation ordered to disclose reserve fund plan and concluded litigation records to unit owner.
The applicant, a condominium unit owner, filed a request for records from the respondent condominium corporation.
Following a hearing, the Condominium Authority Tribunal ordered the respondent to provide the plan for the future funding of the reserve fund and to review and disclose records relating to concluded litigation, finding that the statutory exemption for litigation records ends when the litigation concludes, subject to solicitor-client privilege.
The Tribunal dismissed the applicant's request for a penalty but ordered the respondent to reimburse the applicant's $200 filing fee.
