The applicant sought judicial review of two decisions by the Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal denying him compensation for a back injury allegedly sustained at work.
The applicant argued the Tribunal adjudicator was biased and that the decisions were unreasonable.
The Divisional Court dismissed the application, finding no reasonable apprehension of bias as the applicant failed to object at the hearing, and concluding the Tribunal's finding that no workplace accident occurred was reasonable and supported by the evidence.
