The applicant was charged with impaired driving by drug and possession of methamphetamine.
During the trial, the drug recognition evaluation (DRE) officer testified that the DRE room had video recording capacity and he believed the evaluation was recorded.
The Crown had previously informed the defence that no video existed.
The applicant brought a Charter section 7 application for lost evidence.
The court found that the video recording likely existed, was automatically generated, and was lost due to the unacceptable negligence of the police and Crown in failing to preserve it within the retention period despite defence requests.
Finding that the lost video prejudiced the applicant's ability to make full answer and defence, the court granted a stay of proceedings.