G.B. Morawetz

The plaintiffs brought a motion on consent for a partial judgment to give effect to a settlement agreement regarding past annuities payable under the Robinson Huron Treaty of 1850.

The settlement resolves claims that the Crown failed to fulfill its promise to augment the annuity over time.

Under the agreement, the federal and provincial Crowns will pay $10 billion to the plaintiffs.

The court approved the settlement agreement and granted the partial judgment.

In the receivership of the Bridging Funds, the Receiver brought a motion to determine whether unitholders with Potential Statutory Rescission Claims (based on misrepresentations in offering memoranda) or Potential Redemption Claims (based on unfulfilled redemption requests) were entitled to priority over General Unitholder Claims.

The court held that Potential Redemption Claims were not entitled to priority because the redemption requests had not been completed prior to the receivership.

However, the court held that Potential Statutory Rescission Claims were entitled to priority, finding that the statutory right of rescission under s. 130.1(1) of the Securities Act creates a de facto priority and justifies the imposition of a constructive trust over the invested funds.

Laurentian University brought a motion within its CCAA proceedings for a vesting order to transfer a portion of its property to neighbouring landowners.

The transfer was part of a settlement agreement to resolve a pre-existing encroachment dispute, with the neighbours agreeing to pay $20,000.

The court found it had jurisdiction to grant the vesting order under section 100 of the Courts of Justice Act, read in conjunction with the Conveyancing and Law of Property Act and the CCAA.

The court also confirmed that a vesting order does not constitute a conveyance that engages the subdivision control provisions of the Planning Act.

As the motion was unopposed and resolved outstanding litigation, the vesting order was granted.

In the context of Laurentian University's CCAA proceedings, Thorneloe University appealed a Claims Officer's decision valuing its loss of commercial value claim at zero following the disclaimer of their Federation Agreement.

Thorneloe argued the Claims Officer erred by applying a lost profits approach rather than a loss of business value approach, relying on an expert report valuing the enterprise at $9.8 million.

The Superior Court dismissed the appeal, finding no palpable and overriding error in the Claims Officer's factual determination that Thorneloe was an unprofitable entity and his subsequent rejection of the expert's revenue multiplier methodology.

The court affirmed that expectation damages (lost profits) is the customary remedy for breach of contract, and a non-breaching party is not entitled to be put in a better position than if the contract had been performed.

The Receiver brought a motion seeking approval of its proposed Net Asset Value (NAV) Methodology, the calculation and publication of the 2021 NAV, and the 2022 Permitted Transfers for the Bridging Funds.

The NAV Methodology was developed to facilitate the transfer of units from RRSP to RRIF accounts for unitholders turning 71, as required by the Income Tax Act.

The court found the requested relief appropriate, noting support from Representative Counsel and no opposition from the Ontario Securities Commission or the Canada Revenue Agency.

The motion was granted and the Receiver's Fifteenth Report was approved.

The Applicants brought an unopposed motion in CCAA proceedings for an order extending the Stay Period, approving the Fifty-Fifth Report of the Monitor, and approving the fees and disbursements of the Monitor and counsel.

The court found the Applicants were acting in good faith and with due diligence.

The court granted the motion, extending the Stay Period to March 31, 2023, to encourage expedited resolution, and approved the Monitor's report and the requested fees.

The Monitor in CCAA proceedings brought an unopposed motion to extend the stay of proceedings, approve a settlement agreement with a condominium corporation and another party, and approve its activities and fees.

The court found the settlement agreement reasonable and necessary, providing immediate benefits to stakeholders and a path to reducing a bond.

The court extended the stay to March 3, 2023, and approved the Monitor's activities and fees.

The Foreign Representative brought a motion under section 49 of the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act for an order recognizing and enforcing several additional orders entered by the United States Bankruptcy Court in Chapter 11 proceedings.

The Information Officer supported the motion, noting the integrated nature of the operations and the equal treatment of Canadian and US stakeholders.

The court granted the motion, finding that recognition was appropriate to preserve the value of the Canadian debtors, enable continued operations, and ensure judicial comity.

In the context of CCAA proceedings for Carillion Canada Holdings Inc. and related entities, the affected parties reached an agreement on a Directors and Officers (D&O) Claims Process Order.

The Monitor supported the order to finally resolve D&O claims and complete the administration of the proceedings.

The court found the proposed order reasonable and granted the requested relief, noting that the D&O Insurers' participation does not constitute an admission of coverage or liability.

The Monitor in the CCAA proceedings of Nortel Networks Corporation brought an unopposed motion for approval of its fees and disbursements, as well as those of its counsel, for the period of November 1, 2021, to October 31, 2022.

The court applied the overriding principle of reasonableness and considered the significant results achieved by the Monitor, including completing a $38 million distribution and recovering an additional $21 million.

Finding the fees fair and reasonable, the court granted the motion and approved the accounts.

The Monitor brought an unopposed motion for an order extending the Stay Period under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act to November 18, 2023.

The court found that the parties were working in good faith and with due diligence, and that the applicants had sufficient liquidity.

To ensure supervision over ongoing litigation regarding documentary production, the court granted the stay extension to April 3, 2023, rather than the requested date.

The applicant, in its capacity as court-appointed receiver and manager, brought an unopposed motion in CCAA proceedings for an extension of the stay period, a DIP amendment, approval of a Sale and Investment Solicitation Process (SISP), and approval of the Monitor's Fourth Report.

The court found that the parties were acting in good faith and with due diligence, and that the company had sufficient liquidity to maintain operations.

The motion was granted in its entirety.

The applicant, acting as the Foreign Representative in Chapter 11 proceedings, brought a motion under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act to recognize and enforce Second Day Orders entered by the United States Bankruptcy Court.

The court granted the motion, finding that recognition was appropriate to preserve the value of the Canadian debtors, enable continued operations, and ensure judicial cooperation and comity.

The Court-appointed Monitor in the CCAA proceedings of Laurentian University brought an unopposed motion for approval of its reports, activities, and professional fees.

The Court applied the factors from Confectionately Yours and found the requested fees for the Monitor, EY FAAS, and the Monitor's counsel to be fair and reasonable, given the novel and complex nature of the proceedings.

The Court approved the fees, disbursements, and the Monitor's reports.

In the context of Laurentian University's CCAA proceedings, the moving party brought a motion seeking an order to direct the Monitor to engage in mediation regarding its appeal of a Claims Officer's decision.

The Claims Officer had upheld the Monitor's disallowance of the moving party's $9.8 million claim for loss of commercial value.

The court dismissed the motion, finding that the existing claims process provided an adequate mechanism for resolving the dispute through the pending appeal.

The court also noted that the request for mediation was made too late, as it was brought only after the Claims Officer had already determined the matter on its merits.

Laurentian University of Sudbury brought an unopposed motion for an order sanctioning its Plan of Compromise and Arrangement under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act.

The Plan had been approved by the requisite double majority of affected creditors.

The Superior Court of Justice found that the applicant strictly complied with all statutory requirements, no unauthorized steps were taken, and the Plan was fair and reasonable.

The Court also approved the third-party releases contained in the Plan, unsealed previously sealed exhibits, and extended the stay of proceedings to allow for the Plan's implementation.

Carillion Canada Inc. brought a motion within its CCAA proceedings for an order directing HSBC Bank Canada to return $6.8 million that HSBC had unilaterally debited from Carillion's operating account to set off obligations under letters of credit.

The court found that while HSBC breached the initial stay order by exercising self-help without seeking leave, the funds were legally available for set-off.

Applying the Supreme Court's guidance in Montréal, the court held that HSBC's claim was a valid 'pre-pre' set-off preserved under section 21 of the CCAA.

The motion was dismissed, but HSBC was ordered to pay $50,000 in costs due to its conduct in breaching the stay.

The Canadian Debtors, part of the global Endo pharmaceutical group, applied under Part IV of the CCAA for an interim order recognizing Chapter 11 proceedings commenced in the United States.

The court found that Ontario was the proper jurisdiction for the recognition proceedings due to the debtors' substantial business presence and security agreements governed by Ontario law.

The court granted the interim order, including a stay of proceedings in favour of the Canadian Debtors and affiliated non-applicant entities facing opioid-related class action litigation in Canada, to protect the operations of the Canadian business pending a full recognition hearing.

The applicant brought an unopposed motion in the context of CCAA proceedings.

The court approved the activities and conduct of the Monitor as described in the Second Report, finding the requested relief appropriate in the circumstances.

The Applicants brought an unopposed motion in their CCAA proceedings for an Amended and Restated Initial Order and an order approving a sale and investment solicitation process (SISP).

The court granted the requested relief, extending the stay period, increasing the Directors' and DIP Lenders' Charges, elevating their priority, and relieving the Applicants from incurring further expenses for certain Securities Filings.

The court also approved the SISP, noting appropriate precautions regarding information sharing with the Debenture Trustee.

A request by a litigation counterparty for a specific document preservation order was declined as unnecessary.