1 total
The accused was acquitted of sexual assault due to significant inconsistencies in the complainant's testimony.
This criminal trial concerned a charge of sexual assault.
The court assessed the credibility and reliability of the complainant's evidence, who had special needs, alongside testimony from other witnesses.
The judge found significant inconsistencies and implausibility in the complainant's account, both internally and when compared to other evidence.
Consequently, the Crown failed to prove the accused's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, leading to an acquittal.
