The appellant appealed a trial judgment ordering him to pay spousal and child support, make an equalization payment, and transfer property to the respondent.
The appellant argued the trial judge erred regarding the nature of the family business, alleged embezzlement by the respondent, a claim of malicious prosecution following an assault acquittal, and whether the respondent's conduct repudiated the marriage.
The Court of Appeal dismissed all grounds of appeal, finding the trial judge's conclusions were well-supported by the evidence and that there was no basis for the appellant's claims.