John T. Petrosoniak

The applicant applied for an enhanced A-Z driver's licence and submitted a medical report that was equivocal regarding his alcohol use.

The Registrar demanded further medical information, which the applicant refused to provide, resulting in the suspension of his existing 'G' licence.

The Divisional Court dismissed the application, finding that the Registrar's requirement for additional information and subsequent licence suspension were not unreasonable.

The applicant sought judicial review of a decision by the Ontario Highway Transport Board, which found that the respondent transport company was operating legally within the terms of its extra-provincial operating licence.

The Divisional Court dismissed the application, holding that the Board's decision was protected by a privative clause and was not patently unreasonable, nor was there any breach of natural justice or jurisdictional error.

The applicant sought judicial review of the Registrar of Motor Vehicles' decision to suspend his driver's licence after he refused to submit to a medical examination for a diabetic condition.

A medical practitioner had reported the applicant to the Registrar pursuant to section 203 of the Highway Traffic Act.

The Divisional Court dismissed the application, finding that the Registrar had the authority under the Highway Traffic Act and Ontario Regulation 340/94 to require the medical examination and to suspend the licence for non-compliance.