The applicant father appealed a motion judge's decision varying child support, arguing the judge erred by refusing to impute income to the respondent mother, refusing to make the support increase and extraordinary expenses retroactive, and denying his claims regarding an educational fund.
The father also sought to introduce new evidence of the mother's income tax return.
The Divisional Court admitted the new evidence but found it would not have changed the motion judge's decision.
The court held that the motion judge made no error in fact or law and applied the correct standard of review, dismissing the appeal and awarding costs to the respondent.
