John Dick

The applicant, charged with second degree murder, applied for a directed verdict of acquittal.

The Crown's case was wholly circumstantial, relying on evidence of animus, opportunity, means, and post-offence conduct.

The court applied the test for a directed verdict, engaging in a limited weighing of the circumstantial evidence to determine if reasonable inferences of guilt could be drawn.

The court concluded that the cumulative evidence could support a reasonable inference that the applicant was the shooter, and dismissed the application.

Three airport workers were convicted by a jury of conspiracy to import and importing 30 kilos of cocaine.

They used their security clearance to facilitate the importation by retrieving a specific cargo container.

The court found their moral culpability exceeded that of mere couriers due to the breach of trust and threat to airport security.

After considering the significant delay in bringing the case to trial and their exemplary conduct on bail, the court sentenced each accused to 11 years' imprisonment.

During a jury trial for importing cocaine, the Crown sought to introduce secondary evidence of lost computer records tracking a cargo container.

The original records had been lost by police and purged by the company.

The court allowed the witness to testify to his recollection of the records under the best evidence rule, finding the loss was in good faith.

However, the court refused to allow a police officer to testify about what the witness told him in 2007, ruling that the defence's cross-examination did not amount to an allegation of recent fabrication that would justify admitting a prior consistent statement.