The plaintiff was injured after colliding with an unlit street light pole on a sidewalk.
She initially sued the City of Toronto, believing it owned and maintained the pole.
Years later, she learned the City had sold the street lights to Toronto Hydro.
The plaintiff brought a motion to correct the defendant's name on the basis of misnomer.
The Master found that the 'litigating finger' was clearly pointed at the entity responsible for the pole, and granted the misnomer correction, awarding substantial indemnity costs to the plaintiff, although noting the decision was practically moot as a parallel appeal had already added Toronto Hydro as a defendant.