This appeal concerned a dispute over commercial rent arrears, specifically whether a binding rent relief agreement was in place during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The appellant argued the motion judge erred in finding no genuine issues for trial due to alleged inconsistencies and an incomplete record.
The Court of Appeal found no reversible error in the motion judge's factual findings, including that the rent relief offer had expired before acceptance and that no waiver or promissory estoppel applied.
The appeal was dismissed.
