J. Belton

The accused was charged with impaired driving causing death, dangerous driving causing death, and refusing to provide a breath sample after his vehicle plunged into Lake Ontario, resulting in the death of a passenger.

The Crown relied on circumstantial evidence to prove the accused was driving.

The court accepted the accused's testimony that he and the deceased had switched seats prior to the accident, raising a reasonable doubt as to identity.

The court also found that the accused's symptoms of impairment were equally consistent with hypothermia, and that the breath demand was not unequivocal.

The accused was acquitted on all counts.

The accused was driving a sports car at speeds up to 163 km/h in an 80 km/h zone on a highway, shortly after passing two motorcycles.

As he approached an intersection with a green light, a vehicle turned left into his path, resulting in a collision that killed three people and injured two others.

The court found the accused guilty of dangerous driving causing death and bodily harm, concluding his excessive speed near an intersection was a marked departure from the standard of care.

However, the court acquitted him of criminal negligence, finding a reasonable doubt that his conduct amounted to a marked and substantial departure showing wanton or reckless disregard.

The appellant appealed his summary conviction for two counts of theft under $5,000 and his 90-day intermittent sentence.

The charges arose from missing funds at ATMs the appellant maintained.

The appellant argued the trial judge misapprehended evidence regarding his failure to deny the theft and his reimbursement of the missing funds.

The Superior Court of Justice found no overriding and palpable error in the trial judge's credibility findings or application of the W.(D.) framework.

The court also upheld the sentence, finding it was not demonstrably unfit.

The appeal was dismissed.