The accused, charged under a 13-count indictment, brought an application for the disclosure of unredacted police notes and source documents.
The Crown resisted the application, claiming the redacted information was protected by confidential informant privilege.
Following an in camera Basi hearing, the court found that the individual who provided the information had an expectation of confidentiality and was a confidential informant, not a police agent.
The court scheduled a further in camera hearing to review the unredacted material to determine if any portions could be disclosed to the defence.