Jaret Neil Moldaver

The Applicant brought a motion for interim exclusive possession of the matrimonial home, and the Respondent brought a motion for an order compelling global mediation.

The court granted the Applicant's motion, finding that it was in the best interests of the children to remain in the only home they had known without disruption.

The court dismissed the Respondent's motion for global mediation, finding no agreement between the parties to globally mediate the matter.

The applicant brought a motion for temporary child and spousal support and interim disbursements.

The core issue was determining the respondent's income, as he claimed an income of $200,000 to $260,000 while the applicant argued it was over $1.4 million based on pre-tax corporate income and benefits.

The court found the respondent's Line 150 income was not the fairest determination and fixed his income at $707,500 for temporary support purposes, applying sections 16, 17, and 18 of the Federal Child Support Guidelines.

The court also ordered the respondent to provide a fair market valuation of his business interests, finding them relevant to spousal support despite a marriage contract.

In a family law proceeding, both parties brought motions for various forms of relief.

The applicant sought an advance on equalization, the release of RESP funds, payment of a prior costs award, and an order striking the respondent's pleadings for failure to disclose information regarding his taxi licence.

The respondent sought to sever the divorce, receive an advance on equalization, and remove the joint valuator.

The court granted the applicant a $30,000 advance on equalization, ordered the RESP funds placed in trust, and directed the respondent to pay the valuator's retainer and prior costs from his own funds.

The court declined to strike the respondent's pleadings but restricted his ability to lead valuation evidence at trial.

The respondent's motions were dismissed.