3 total
Application for accident benefits dismissed as injuries fell within the Minor Injury Guideline and limits were exhausted.
The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident.
The insurer denied various treatment and assessment plans on the basis that the applicant's injuries fell within the Minor Injury Guideline (MIG) and the $3,500 limit had been exhausted.
The applicant argued for removal from the MIG due to a pre-existing condition, chronic pain, and psychological impairments.
The Tribunal found insufficient medical evidence to support removal from the MIG.
As the MIG limits were exhausted, the disputed treatment plans were not reasonable and necessary, and the application was dismissed.
Application for accident benefits dismissed as injuries fell within the Minor Injury Guideline.
The applicant was involved in a rear-end motor vehicle accident and sought statutory accident benefits, including income replacement benefits and funding for physiotherapy and psychological assessments.
The respondent denied the benefits, arguing the applicant's injuries fell within the Minor Injury Guideline (MIG).
The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to provide objective medical evidence that his physical or psychological injuries fell outside the MIG, or that he met the AMA Guides criteria for chronic pain.
The Tribunal also found the applicant did not prove a substantial inability to perform the essential tasks of his pre-accident employment, relying on the clinical notes of his treating physician which lacked mention of accident-related symptoms or inability to work during the disputed period.
The application was dismissed.
Application for arbitration dismissed and counsel removed from record due to applicant's failure to participate.
The applicant's counsel brought a motion to be removed from the record after being unable to contact the applicant for instructions.
The applicant failed to attend a pre-hearing discussion and the subsequent motion hearing.
The arbitrator granted counsel's motion to be removed from the record.
Furthermore, the arbitrator dismissed the application for arbitration without a hearing under Rule 68 of the Dispute Resolution Practice Code, finding it frivolous, vexatious, or commenced in bad faith due to the applicant's failure to participate.
The insurer was awarded $500 in expenses.