The moving party, a surgeon whose hospital privileges were not renewed in 2016, brought a motion to set aside a single judge's order dismissing his motion to set aside a Registrar's dismissal for delay.
The responding hospitals requested a dismissal under Rule 2.1 of the Rules of Civil Procedure.
The Court of Appeal found the moving party exhibited hallmarks of a vexatious litigant by exhausting all rights of review and attempting to re-determine settled issues.
The motion was dismissed as an abuse of process and a collateral attack on underlying decisions, with costs awarded to the responding parties.
