The applicant sought statutory accident benefits for psychological impairments following the death of his step-son in a motorcycle accident.
The respondent insurer raised two preliminary issues: whether a step-parent qualifies as an 'insured person' under the Schedule, and whether the applicant was barred from claiming benefits under s. 61 because he was receiving Workplace Safety and Insurance Act (WSIA) benefits for PTSD related to his work as a paramedic.
The Tribunal applied a purposive approach to statutory interpretation, finding that the undefined term 'child' in the Schedule includes a step-child, making the applicant an insured person.
The Tribunal also found the applicant was not barred by s. 61, as the basis for his WSIA claim (work-related trauma) differed from his accident benefits claim (psychological injuries from the step-son's death).
The matter was ordered to proceed to a substantive hearing.