4 total
The court approved a $70.25 million class action settlement regarding trailing commissions paid to discount brokers.
This motion concerned the approval of a class action settlement regarding trailing commissions paid by TD Asset Management Inc. to discount brokers.
The plaintiff alleged improper payments and misrepresentations.
The court approved a $70.25 million settlement for the class, along with the proposed notice plan, distribution protocol, and appointment of an administrator.
The court also approved class counsel fees and disbursements, an interim payment to the litigation funder, release of the funder's security, and an honorarium for the representative plaintiff.
The court granted an unopposed motion to certify a class action regarding trailing commissions paid to discount brokers.
The plaintiff brought an unopposed motion to certify a class proceeding concerning the alleged improper payment of trailing commissions to discount brokers from CIBC mutual funds.
The court applied the five criteria under s. 5(1) of the Class Proceedings Act, 1992, adopting previous judicial analyses for the first four criteria.
The court found the representative plaintiff capable and the proposed litigation and notice plans appropriate, granting the certification order.
Unopposed motion to certify class action regarding mutual fund trailing commissions granted.
The plaintiff brought an unopposed motion to certify the proceeding as a class action under the Class Proceedings Act, 1992.
The action alleges that the defendant improperly paid trailing commissions to discount brokers out of mutual fund assets.
The court found that all certification criteria were met, relying on previous decisions in similar cases, and granted the certification order.
Defendant's request to hear summary judgment motion concurrently with class certification motion denied.
The defendant in a proposed class action regarding mutual fund trailing commissions sought a direction that its proposed summary judgment motion be heard concurrently with the plaintiff's certification motion.
The court dismissed the request, finding that the summary judgment motion would require significant responding evidence, lengthy cross-examinations, and would increase expense and delay.
The court held that hearing the certification motion first would be more efficient and could narrow the issues for any subsequent summary judgment motion.