A motion was brought seeking various forms of disclosure and re-attendance at discovery.
Some matters were resolved by consent, including a defendant municipality serving a supplementary affidavit of documents and a representative attending discovery for up to 2 hours.
The court addressed the requirement for leave to bring the contested parts of the motion, denying leave for most requests as they did not fall under Rule 48.04(2)(b).
For the remaining contested relief concerning a co-defendant's supplementary affidavit, the court declined to order it as the co-defendant agreed to comply with their obligations.
The scope of the municipality's re-attendance was limited to documents in the supplementary affidavit.
The court also ordered the moving party to pay installment costs thrown away for amendments to the statement of claim to the responding parties.
